We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time.ContinueFind out more
There is a famous theorem in the field of mathematics known as graph theory.
I also read about a new play that explored mathematical theorems.
Moore proceeded to prove fifty-two theorems from this set of five assumptions.
He proved a major theorem concerning the measure-preserving property of Hamiltonian dynamics.
That one could know how to prove theorems of elementary geometry without knowing how much seven times nine was seemed more than slightly strange.
Certainly the theorems which Galileo had proved on the centres of gravity of solids, and left in Rome, were discussed in this correspondence.
There is a theorem proved by Kurt Godel in 1931, which is the Incompleteness Theorem for mathematics.
The movie tosses mathematical theories and theorems in the audience's direction, but explains them simply and lucidly; no one is going to become lost or bored.
In every one of these works Moore clearly stated undefined terms and axioms, then methodically proved theorems based on them.
In order to prove the theorem, Wiles had to draw on and extend several ideas at the core of modern mathematics.
He introduced students to the main ideas of the subject by means of illuminating examples and by giving proofs of important special cases of more general theorems.
This theorem was also proved by Felix Bernstein and independently by E Schröder.
In 1976, Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken finally managed to prove the theorem for a second time.
There are many reasons why certain theorems are not named after their discoverer but after a later rediscoverer.
In modern Fourier analysis, theorems are usually less important than the techniques developed to prove them.
Euclid's Elements is remarkable for the clarity with which the theorems are stated and proved.
Rather than being remembered as the first woman this or that, I would prefer to be remembered, as a mathematician should, simply for the theorems I have proved and the problems I have solved.
In 1964 John Bell, an Irish theoretical physicist, published a theorem that seemed to prove the argument for non-locality.
Moore suggested that they be given some theorems to prove.
Yet, as we strive to advance frontiers and prove new theorems, we make intuitive leaps that require substantial effort to be transformed into complete, precise proofs.
Nash and I proved the same theorem, or, rather, two theorems very close to each other.
Ideally the definitions would generate all the concepts from clear and distinct ideas, and the proofs would generate all the theorems from self-evident truths.
And quite frequently I state a number of definitions and ask students to formulate some theorems using them.
The activity of proving things about space-time is the same kind of activity as proving theorems about real numbers.